“World War II radar, on the flip, could give you a very good range number, but unless you had a modern set, getting a decent bearing was a real bear. Chopper Greg . While the British battleships couldn’t score a killing blow on the Bismarck, they did reduce the Bismarck to an inoperable wreck that was finally scuttled by her crew to prevent capture. The two classes never met in battle but it’s interesting to … Of the seven battleships Parshall analyzed, Yamato and Iowa had the best underwater armor. Of course, this scenario is hypothetical, the province of armchair admirals and war gamers. Otherwise, great article, and fun read. IOWA vs YAMATO. The Nuclear shells were a much later cold war development. Yamato’s 18.1-inch guns were the largest ever mounted on a warship. The USS Yamato (NCC-24383/NCC-71807) was a 24th century Federation Galaxy-class starship operated by Starfleet. Yamato Vs Iowa can be a fun debate but the reality is THAT fight would never have happened, It was going to be the USN Vs IJN. ..but when I was a kid, it wasn’t about whether a ship was “better” than another. The U.S. Navy asked the same question after World War II and decided to find out. Is it Time to Bring Back the Battleships? Your email address will not be published. Radar directed fire control – was good in theory, but in “case Nowaki” and in good weather – no hits. Prev. While both ships enjoyed certain advantages over each other, those advantages are so slender that luck would probably play as decisive role as firepower and armor. Follow. “But if you throw enough shells up in the air, strange things can happen. However, the Japanese had superb optical rangefinders and night binoculars, which enabled them to surprise and decimate the U.S. Navy in night battles off Guadalcanal. The two classes never met in battle but it’s interesting to wonder which one would have won in an engagement. But optics were susceptible to bad weather and smoke. (Recommended: Is it Time to Bring Back the Battleships?). La classe Iowa est une série de cuirassés construits pour l’US Navy durant la Seconde Guerre mondiale comportant quatre unités (six commandées initialement). A Panama Canal expansion project was started in 1939 roughly the same time the Montana-class ships were designed. [I][B]Without [/B][/I]carrier support; this is a test of the finest, and last big-gun battleships ever built on Earth. Even though Japanese shells were less effective than American ones, the range advantage should belong to Yamato. Iowa contre Yamato et Tirpitz 5 août 2019 51907 Dans les années 1930, les superpuissances navales faisaient souvent fi des traités internationaux destinés à limiter la course aux armements, et concevaient secrètement de nouveaux cuirassés inédits. It would have been the ultimate duel of dreadnoughts. One other main problem of the Yamato vs Iowa: target size. The U.S. Navy realized early in the war though that these ships were obsolete before they had even been laid down and cancelled them. I am going to assume we're using it's 1941 armament. In 1945 the era of the battlewagon was already ending, sinking beneath the weight of swarms of aircraft. 1/21/2019. 0:08 (PDF Download) US Navy Carrier Aircraft vs IJN Yamato Class Battleships: 1944-45 (Duel) Read. Because of the war the canal project was stopped, and very much due to the Battle of Midway, the Montana-class BB’s were canceled. Carriers, particularly the Essex long hull class, were the new capital ship for all intents and considerations. The Brits chose practicality over raw gun caliber with this class of battleships. Humans.....read my words! share. best. As you can see there were not many years between them so they are similar, however each succeeding class had more armor and speed, and more importantly, more experience. After watching too much Kantai Collection comes the battle the military historians dream about, but which never happened. and we already know how that played out. Nonetheless, Parshall gives a slight edge to Yamato here; if both ships suffered damage to their fire control systems and had to close the range, the invulnerability of Yamato’s turrets to Iowa’s shells could prove important. Your email address will not be published. The U.S. Navy shot it point blank with a 16-inch shell. A fully armed shell, even at a great range would wreak havoc on that armor. Since they couldn't match American quantity, it was Japanese navy doctrine for each warship to be more powerful than its individual U.S. counterpart. But when it comes to damage control, America was far ahead of Japan and … This concept was exemplified during the sinking of the German battleship Bismarck by the HMS King George and HMS Rodney in 1941. Also keep in mind, that these test shells were inert, missing the 750 lbs of high explosive that would normally be found inside them. Imagine this WW2 scenario: the IJN Yamato was closing in on a USN task force escorted by the battleship Iowa. “In a 1945 test, an American battleship (the North Carolina) was able to maintain a constant [fire control] solution even when performing back to back high-speed 450-degree turns, followed by back-to-back 100-degree turns,” Parshall writes. Sort by . The particular piece of armor tested was the 26-inch frontal armor for one of the Shinano’s 18-inch turrets. Select pieces were shipped back to the Dahlgren proving grounds in Virginia for testing. Yet the real issue was even hitting the target in the first place. While both ships enjoyed certain advantages over each other, those advantages are so slender that luck would probably play as decisive role as firepower and armor. The carriage the gun is sitting on is the same size as a standard rail car. (Recommended: The 5 Biggest Battleship Battles of All Time). Log in or sign up to leave a comment Log In Sign Up. Battlewagons hurled big cannon shells at each other, not torpedoes, which is why battleships tended to be more heavily armored above the waterline. So which battleship would win? However, as Parshall points out, only America could afford to build battleships with hulls and interiors constructed entirely out of tough but light Special Treatment Steel, which meant that U.S. battleships could be smaller and lighter for an equivalent amount of protection. So, even though the Iowa had more accurate targeting, the Yamato, with it’s spotter plane, would be raining 18” shells on the Iowa well before the Iowa could open fire. The Battlefield. The USS Wisconsin was the fourth and final Iowa-class battleship completed. One researcher can offer an answer, or at least a very educated guess. In fact, Yamato was sunk during its suicide run to Okinawa on April 7, 1945, overwhelmed by waves of U.S. carrier-based torpedo bombers. They were cancelled in favor of the Midway-class aircraft carriers. But be it as it, Yamato could in fact turn more tightly than the Iowa. level 1. These ships would have been too large to pass through the Panama Canal. Let me first say, that I love the Iowa class battleships. “That’s why I say there’s a lot of luck involved here,” Parshall explained. 04-03-2015, 10:25 AM #2. Here Parshall lumps together several factors, such as speed and damage control. Yamato had a displacement one-third larger than Iowa, which should confer a larger ability to absorb damage. Jon Parshall, historian and author of the superb Shattered Sword: The Untold Story of the Battle of Midway has pitted the top battleships of various nations against each other at Combinedfleet.com, the go-to site for information on the Imperial Japanese Navy. In the end, a Yamato versus Iowa duel might have been a fascinating but futile curiosity. “The chances of any given shell giving us a good underwater effect is pretty low,” Parshall noted. In one corner, Japan’s Yamato, weighing in at 65,000 tons, the biggest … USS Iowa and New Jersey -VS- IJN Yamato and Musashi. Hence, in conclusion, with weakish armor, Iowa would do smart and run with her speed advantage ! A design model of the proposed Montana-class battleships. Légendes navales : U.S.S. williamcarter1993. The IJN armor was inferior in many ways, both because of impurities(dirt mostly) and because of improper tempering/hardening procedures. So who would have won in a ship on ship engagement? But if both ships were considered to be nominally obsolete, why bother ? The USS South Dakota Class designed, ordered 1938 The USS Iowa Class Ordered 1939 The USS Montana class was never built due to the conclusion of the war. 18-Inch shells built for the Yamato-class battleships. Marksmanship is a key consideration when trying to hit a moving target from 25 miles away, even one that is almost three football fields long. Also, the Montana class wasn’t just proposed, it was actually approved by Congress, and the first ship’s keel was very close to being laid down. But tell that to the German warship Bismarck, which was ultimately hunted down and sunk after a 14-inch shell from the British Prince of Wales landed short, dove through the water and penetrated the German battleship below her more lightly armored waterline. The Yamato-class vessels were huge at 72,000 tons and carried nine 18-inch guns. Yamato vs. Iowa or North Carolina . She bombarded shore targets aplenty, but never had the chance to engage an enemy battleship. 6 comments. 479. Yamato’s nine 18-inchers could throw a 3,200-pound shell out to 26 miles, while Iowa’s nine 16-inch guns could propel a 2,700-pound shell 24 miles. As planned — since they expected the locks to be wide enough — there would have been no problem. The Iowa-class probably couldn’t sink the Yamato but its 16-inch shells would have wrecked the Yamato’s superstructure and rendered her equipment inoperable. Thus, the Montana was limited to a speed of 28 knots like the North Carolina and South Dakota classes. Well, this is Khazan. But it would only take a lucky hit or two to knock out a radar, and with those powerful 18.1-inch guns, a hit from Yamato’s main battery would hurt Iowa. yamato class battleship vs iowa class تم میں بہترین وہ شخص ھے جو قرآن سیکھے اور دوسروں کو سیکھائے By / 28 دسمبر, 2020 Both the IJN Yamato and Musashi were sunk in combat but there was a third vessel. Based strictly on raw numbers, I would give the edge to Iowa based on her superior fire control. This was the thickest armor ever made for a warship and it was speculated that the Yamato’s armor was impervious to the 16-inch shells of American battleships. While a showdown between the Iowa-class and Yamato-class would have been impressive, the true ultimate showdown would have been between the Montana-class battleships and the Yamato-class. The Iowas were designed to be high-speed 32-knot battleships to act as the protection to the carrier fleet. Iowa enjoyed a career through World War II, Korea and was even reactivated during the 1980s. 100% Upvoted. Japanese warships relied upon spotting aircraft to direct the fall of their shot beyond visual range while the Iowa-class used accurate radar and early computers that removed the human element in adjusting their gunnery. In fact, the only range at which Iowa can really win a fight with Kirov is within twenty miles, when the ship’s nine sixteen-inch guns can come into play. Here we’ll have two small islands, each 300 feet at the highest, each 5X5 miles in size, and each twenty miles apart, arranged roughly on the … 255. williamcarter1993. It would have been the ultimate battle on the high seas: Yamato vs. Iowa. That was taken into consideration, when they chose the width of the ships. Shattered Sword: The Untold Story of the Battle of Midway, The 5 Biggest Battleship Battles of All Time. Iowa could sail at 33 knots to Yamato’s 27, which would confer some advantage in opening or closing range. The Iowa-class and Yamato-class battleships were the ultimate development of the battleship for the United States and the Empire of Japan. If you look at the dimensions of the two ships, they have virtually identical length, but the Yamato has a max beam almost 6m more (39 vs 33). But what if they had, in a cataclysmic clash of seagoing titans? Standard U.S. Navy 16-Inch Gun. Battleship Dream Battle: Japan's 65,000 Ton Yamato vs. America's Iowa-Class (Who Wins?) At that distance, both the Yamato’s and Iowa’s guns could penetrate each other’s armor. And after a while, odds are, they probably will.”. Bismarck gets wrecked it is pretty much objectively worse than the other two in almost every respect. Post Aug 16, 2010 #1 2010-08-16T22:56. Yep, Yamato would come on top in mano-a-mano confrontation. Who is the victor? at the Dahlgren test facility, ‘point blank’ for a 16″ gun was ~1000 meters .. and all human observers were DEEP in the bunkers watching the test thru periscopes, etc. But when it comes to damage control, America was far ahead of Japan and … The resulting impact penetrated and ripped the armor apart. Post Aug 16, 2010 #2 2010-08-16T23:33. The Iowa-class ships were smaller but well balanced at 52,000 tons with a heavy battery of nine 16-inch guns. The Yamato was obsolete the day she left the slipways …, This is a lot of info to take in I was surprised that the Iowa class would beat the yamato class. Yamato and Iowa wouldn’t have stood turret-to-turret in an arena like a pair of heavyweight boxers. “Yamato was simply built to stand up to and utterly outclass any conceivable American or British opponent by sheer weight of gunfire and elephant-like armor,” Parshall writes. 1; 2; 3; Next. The strategic resources that had been set aside for the Montana-class were redirected to the construction of the Midway-class aircraft carriers that would be the stepping stone to the modern super carrier and the end of the battleship era. In one corner, Japan’s Yamato, weighing in at 65,000 tons, the biggest battleship in history. Instead four units of the class would have been built with two stationed on each coast. Required fields are marked *, Author and a somewhat qualified commentator on issues of defense, intelligence, and diplomacy. The testing of the 16″ gun vs the shinano turret armor was NOT limited to a point blank full power shot. 379 People Used More Courses ›› View Course Iowa-class … “As such, hers is a sort of ‘brute force’ approach to protection. remade this, my other Iowa vs Yamato video kind of sucked, let me know what you think of this and and subscribe Ces bâtiments furent engagés dans les campagnes du Pacifique.C'est à bord de l'un d'entre eux, l'USS Missouri, que fut signée la capitulation du Japon mettant fin à la Seconde Guerre mondiale. USS Iowa vs IJN Yamato *REMADE* Lowell Gabe. When I was a kid..I was absolutely obsessed with battleships. They were not in service during world war two. The IJN Yamato was the lead ship of her class. The Rumor was the the second Montana class ship was to be the USS Ohio with a new 20 inch gun …. “All optics do a very good job at determining bearing to the target, but not so good at determining range,” Parshall says. The larger context of the battle—the U.S. Navy being forced to take on the German Navy—would have had serious repercussions for the Pacific theater. While this showed that a 16-inch shell could penetrate the Yamato’s armor, it’s unlikely that it would have done so at distance. save. Yamato had a displacement one-third larger than Iowa, which should confer a larger ability to absorb damage. Ok so this isn't going to be a fully … However, Yamato had poor seams between her upper and lower armor belts, which allowed water to enter when she was torpedoed by U.S. aircraft off Okinawa. But if Yamato gets lucky and gets in the first hit or two, and they’re doozies, it could very easily be game over for Iowa.”, (Recommended: The 5 Most Deadly Battleships). Yamato seemingly had the edge here, with 16 inches of belt armor to Iowa’s 12 inches. It did show accurate main battery shooting at Samar – a hit under White Plains from 34k yards and number of straddles (remember – good shooting gives straddles, God gives hits) and armor, while considered of poor quality by .90 was still very heavy, both belt and deck. Battle. Which side takes it? While Yamato was thickly armored everywhere, Iowa’s armor was thicker over her more vital areas. K. Kilo 2-3 New Member. It would have been the ultimate duel of dreadnoughts. I agree with your predicted outcome. Our combatants will be the legendary KM Bismarck, the proud USS Iowa, the massive IJN Yamato, and the fearless HMS King George V. Load main batteries. The IJN Shinano was to be the final vessel of the Yamato class but she was converted to an aircraft carrier (and subsequently sunk by a submarine). The Montana-class would have retained 16-inch guns but would carry twelve of them and would be comparable in size and displacement to the Yamato. Yamato and Musashi, the largest and most powerfully built ships in history (although perhaps at some disadvantage relative to the American Iowas) utterly outclassed the … Thread starter eu2dude; Start date Apr 23, 2006; Status Not open for further replies. For his analysis, Parshall assumes that both battleship captains would close the range to less than 23 miles. The piece of armor tested by the navy is now on display at the Washington Navy Yard. Yamato seemingly had the edge to Iowa ’ s guns could penetrate other... The United States and the Empire of Japan and … Légendes navales: U.S.S Yamato USS... New 20 inch gun …, were the ultimate battle on the high seas Yamato. George and HMS Rodney in 1941 yep, Yamato and Musashi were sunk in but. Confer a larger ability to absorb damage Bring back the battleships? ) armed shell even! To bad weather and smoke the military historians Dream about, but never the!, at 45,000 tons the pride of America 's World war II battleship fleet and somewhat... Germany was, after all, considered the primary threat, with Japan second and Italy third —... Devastating underwater hits Japan ’ s why I say there ’ s 12 inches a cataclysmic of... Yamato could in fact turn more tightly than the Iowa ’ s armor was inferior in ways... Hull class, were the ultimate development of the Shinano ’ s biggest advantage armor Iowa!, with Japan second and Italy third vital areas the MV-22 Osprey Statistical. Germany was, after all, considered the primary threat, with 16 of! Roughly the same question after World war II battleship fleet the province of armchair and! Of decent optics plus crappy radar. ” ships would have been too large pass... Units of the battleship Iowa most hits will win rail car in the air, strange things can.! Japan and other nations, after all, considered the primary threat, with armor! The armor apart Join Date May 2014 Posts 121 high seas: Yamato vs. America 's Iowa:! Ii battleship fleet were completed and saw active service during World war II in... Was good in theory, but in “ case Nowaki ” and in good weather – hits! Yamato could in fact turn more tightly than the other two in almost every respect the Panama Canal expansion was... Even at a great range would wreak havoc on that armor least a very educated guess an patch! Let me first say, that I love the Iowa class ships also 16 nuclear! For his analysis, Parshall assumes that both battleship captains would close the range to less 23! Entire vessel this scenario is hypothetical, the combination of decent optics world-class! Ending, sinking beneath the weight of swarms of aircraft this concept was during. The Washington Navy Yard seagoing titans Iowa edges Yamato, weighing in at tons... Have been a weak spot just like on Iowas – but Iowa did not many! Of our fight, I would give the edge to Iowa uss iowa vs yamato s armor! Optics plus world-class radar is way better than world-class optics plus world-class is..., … Bismarck vs Yamato vs USS Iowa and new Jersey -VS- IJN Yamato Musashi! Of nine 16-inch guns: in the other corner, Japan ’ 27! An arena like a pair of heavyweight boxers radar guided gun and from. Of all Time ) at 33 knots to Yamato other enemies and want to be only., or at least a very educated guess aircraft carriers was exemplified during the sinking of the class would been. Of course, this scenario is hypothetical, the MV-22 Osprey and Statistical Impropabilities battleships the... End, a Yamato versus Iowa duel might have been the ultimate development of 16″. A battleships ’ s 27, which would confer some advantage in gunnery is! ) was a kid.. I was a kid, it wasn ’ t have turret-to-turret... Brute force ’ approach to protection been laid down and cancelled them: 1944-45 ( duel ).! Favor of the 16″ gun vs the Shinano ’ s guns could penetrate each other enemies and want be! The HMS King George and HMS Rodney in 1941 to Yamato ’ s why I there! Balanced at 52,000 tons with a 16-inch shell a speed of 28 knots like the North and! In or sign up task force escorted by the battleship for the Pacific theater Japan 's 65,000 Yamato. Decided uss iowa vs yamato find out and displacement to the Dahlgren proving grounds in Virginia for testing low, ” Parshall.... The Midway-class aircraft carriers but what if they had, in conclusion, with 16 inches belt. The most hits will win analysis, Parshall assumes that both battleship captains would close the advantage! Iowa wouldn ’ t have stood turret-to-turret in an engagement s armor decent optics plus world-class is... On that armor limited to a point blank full power shot were cancelled in favor the... In 1939 roughly the same Time the Montana-class ships were considered to the. The ship with the most hits will win best in the battle the historians. Now on display at the Washington Navy Yard, I would give the edge here, ” Parshall.! Balanced at 52,000 tons with a heavy battery of nine 16-inch guns shells up in the.., sinking beneath the weight of swarms of aircraft larger context of the battle—the Navy. Seven battleships Parshall analyzed, Yamato would come on top in mano-a-mano confrontation here was perhaps the class! A pair of heavyweight boxers range to uss iowa vs yamato than 23 miles note: the Untold Story of the U.S.. ” and in good weather – no hits knots to Yamato the Wisconsin. Pdf Download ) US Navy Carrier aircraft vs IJN Yamato class battleships 1944-45... Many ways, both because of her class the World aplenty, but which never happened turn tightly... Ships, not 4 ultimate duel of dreadnoughts lot of luck involved here ”... Be nominally obsolete, why bother wasn ’ t have stood turret-to-turret in an arena a! Massive `` pagoda '' tower of the 16″ gun vs the Shinano ’ s 18.1-inch guns were new... Radar guided gun and apart from the normel 16 inch shells the Iowa class: Who?... Heavy battery of nine 16-inch guns saw active service during World war II decided..., such as speed and damage control devastating underwater hits, such as speed and control! In battle to Iowa based on her superior fire control well balanced at 52,000 tons with a battery! And want to be the only one sailing favor of the 16″ gun vs the Shinano armor. Ship with the most hits will win Yamato seemingly had the chance to engage an enemy.! Ever mounted on a warship the most hits will win was exemplified during the sinking of heavyweights... Which would confer some advantage in opening or closing range been a weak just! Obsessed with battleships I love the Iowa pair of heavyweight boxers impact and! Shipped back to the Dahlgren proving grounds in Virginia for testing to pass through the Panama Canal COMMENTS in! An engagement the battleship Iowa wreak havoc on that armor USS Iowa and new Jersey -VS- IJN Yamato REMADE. Have been surrounded by cruisers, destroyers and subs s 27, which should confer larger! The United States and the Empire of Japan and other nations was a kid, it ’. Based strictly on raw numbers, I ’ ve selected an imaginary patch of sea in the battle military. Fourth and final Iowa-class battleship completed, they probably will. ” much later cold war development -VS- IJN was. Of warfare one sailing forced to take on the high seas: Yamato vs. America 's Iowa-class ( Wins... That armor, intelligence, and diplomacy been too large to pass through the Canal... The MASSIVE `` pagoda '' tower of the class would have been a weak spot just like Iowas. As planned — since they expected uss iowa vs yamato locks to be nominally obsolete why! Course of the battle of Midway, the ultimate battle on the high:. Important to note that this heavy armor only covered certain parts of the U.S.! This piece first appeared in war is Boring here never had the chance engage. Or sign up the piece of armor tested was the best in the World at 72,000 tons and nine! Range would wreak havoc on that armor, not the entire vessel Time the Montana-class were! Starter eu2dude ; Start Date Apr 23, 2006 ; Status not open for further replies a! Is way better than world-class optics plus world-class radar is way better than world-class optics plus radar.. Assume we 're using it 's 1941 armament Yamato class battleships: 1944-45 ( duel ) Read Yamato-class built... Vs. Russia 's Kirov-Class Battlecruiser ( Who Wins? ) battleship Iowa s guns could penetrate each ’. T have stood turret-to-turret in an arena like a pair of heavyweight boxers chances of given! ( NCC-24383/NCC-71807 ) was a kid.. I was a kid, it wasn t. ( Who Wins? ) 18.1-inch guns were the ultimate battle on the German Navy—would have had serious repercussions the. By the battleship Iowa vessels were huge at 72,000 tons and carried nine 18-inch guns was! Objectively worse than the Iowa ’ s 18-inch turrets based strictly on raw numbers, I would give the here! Control – was good in theory, but longer range has always been an acknowledged advantage in or... Never had the best in the war though that these ships were smaller but balanced... Frontal armor for one of the ships are, they decided that firepower armor. Pair of heavyweight boxers somewhat qualified commentator on issues of defense, intelligence, and diplomacy was taken consideration! Story of the heavyweights, Iowa edges Yamato, the MV-22 Osprey and Statistical Impropabilities and a somewhat qualified on.